Email this article 
Post a Comment The “Slavic-Russian Nation” in the Historical Literature of Ukraine and Russia from the 1600s to the mid-1700s
Abstract
The article analyzes the history of the concept of a “Slavic-Russian nation”. The concept was first used by Zacharia Kopystenskij in 1624, but its wide occurrence starts in 1674, when Synopsis, the first printed history of Russia, was published in Kiev. In the book, “Slavic-Russian nation” refers to an ancient Slavic people, which preceded the “Russian nation” (“rossiyskiy narod”) of the time in which the book was written. Uniting “Slavs” and “Russians” (“rossy”) into one “Slavic-Russian nation”, the author of Synopsis followed the idea which was proposed but not specifically defined by M. Stryjkovskij in his Chronicle (1582) and, later, by the Kievan intellectuals of the 1620s–30s. The construction of Synopsis was to prove that “Russians” (“rossy”) were united by both the common Slavic origin and the Church Slavonic language used by the Orthodox Slavic peoples. According to Synopsis, they were also supposed to be united by the Muscovite tsar’s authority and the Orthodox religion. The whole conception made Synopsis very popular in Russia in the late 17th century and later. Earlier in the 17th-century literature of the Muscovite State, some authors also proposed ethno-genetic constructions based on Stryjkovskij’s Chronicle and other Renaissance historiography. Independently from the Kievan literature, the word “Slavic-Russian” was invented (first appearance in the Legend about Sloven and Rus, 1630s). Both the Kievan and Muscovite constructions of a mythical “Slavic-Russian nation” aimed at making an “imagined” ethno-cultural nation. They contributed to forming a new Russian imperial identity in the Petrine epoch. However, the concept of a “Slavic-Russian nation” was not in demand in the political discourse of the Petrine Empire. It was sporadically used in the historical works of the 18th century (largely due to the influence of Synopsis), but played no significant role in the proposed interpretations of Russian history.
DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2020.9.2.9
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Русский)References
Berelowitch W., Les origines de la Russie dans l’historiographie russe au XVIIIe siècle, Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales, 58/1, Jan.-Feb., 2003, 63–84.
Bulanin D. M., Turilov A. A., Skazanie o Slovene i Ruse, Slovar′ knizhnikov i knizhnosti Drevnei Rusi, 3/3: XVII vek, P–S, St. Petersburg, 1998, 444–447.
Dell’Agata G., Russian Translation of “The Kingdom of Slavs” by Mauro Orbini, Sovetskoe slavianovedenie, 1990, 5, 58–68.
Dmitriev M. V., Shpirt A. M., Identichnost′ Rusi i «rusi» v pis′mennykh pamiatnikakh ukrainsko-belorusskoi pravoslavnoi kul′tury XV–XVII vv.: istoriograficheskie zametki, A. V. Doronin, ed., Narrativy rusi kontsa XV – serediny XVIII v.: v poiskakh svoei istorii, Moscow, 2018, 332–383.
Doronin A. V., Drevniaia Rus′ do Drevnei Rusi: M. V. Lomonosov o nachalakh rossiiskoi natsii, Idem, ed., Drevniaia Rus′ posle Drevnei Rusi: diskurs vostochnoslavianskogo (ne)edinstva, Moscow, 2017, 358–393.
Doronin A. V., Evropa rubezha XV–XVI vv.: na poroge novoi istorii (vzgliad s Zapada), Idem, ed., Narrativy rusi kontsa XV – serediny XVIII v.: v poiskakh svoei istorii, Moscow, 2018, 16–58.
Eremin I. P., K istorii obshchestvennoi mysli na Ukraine vtoroi poloviny XVII v., Trudy Otdela drevnerusskoi literatury, 10, 1954, 212–222.
Erusalimsky K. Yu., Res Rossica et Moscovitica: zametki ob issledovaniiakh D. V. Karnaukhova, The Historical Reporter, 9 (156), Moscow, 2014, 294–317.
Gol′dberg A. L., Ideia slavianskogo edinstva v sochineniiakh Iuriia Krizhanicha, Trudy Otdela drevnerusskoi literatury, 19, Moscow, Leningrad, 1963, 373–390.
Gol′dberg A. L., Legendarnaia povest′ XVII v. o drevneishei istorii Rusi, Vspomogatel′nye istoricheskie distsipliny, 13, Leningrad, 1982, 50–63.
Golub I., The Slavic Idea of Juraj Križanić, I. Banac, F. E. Sysyn, eds., Harvard Ukrainian Studies, 10/3-4, December (= Concepts of Nationhood in Early Modern Eastern Europe), 1986, 438–491.
Karnaukhov D. V., Istoriia russkikh zemel' v pol'skoi khronografii kontsa XV – nachala XVII v., Novosibirsk, 2009.
Kohut Z. E., The Question of Russo-Ukrainian Unity and Ukrainian Distinctiveness in Early Modern Ukrainian Thought and Culture, Idem, Roots of Identity: Studies on Early Modern and Modern Ukraine, Kiev, 2004, 133–168.
Kohut Z., From Japheth to Moscow: Narrating Biblical and Ethnic Origins of the Slavs in Polish, Ukrainian and Russian Historiography (Sixteenth-Eighteenth Centuries), Journal of Ukrainian Studies, 33–34, 2008–2009 (= O. A. Andriewsky et al., eds., Tentorium Honorum: Essays Presented to Frank E. Sysyn on His Sixtieth Birthday), 2010, 279–292.
Mylnikov A. S., The Picture of Slavic World: the View from the Eastern Europe. Ethnic Legends, Preassumptions, Protohypothesis XVIth – beginning of the XVIIIth century, St. Petersburg, 1996.
Mytsyk Iu. A., Ukrainskie letopisi XVII veka, Dnepropetrovsk, 1978.
Nemensky O. B., Istoriia Rusi v «Palinodii» Zakharii Kopystenskogo i «Oborone unii» L′va Krevzy, Ukraina ta Rosiia: problemy politychnykh i sotsiokul′turnykh vidnosyn, Kiev, 2003, 409‒434.
Nemensky O. B., Predstavlenie slavianskoi obshchnosti v «Palinodii» Zakharii Kopystenskogo, Slavianskii mir v tret′em tysiacheletii, Slavianskaia identichnost′ – novye faktory konsolidatsii. Sbornik statei, Moscow, 2008, 120–127.
Nikolaev S. I., Pol′sko-russkie literaturnye sviazi XVI – XVIII vv.: Bibliograficheskie materialy, St. Petersburg, 2008.
Peshtich S. L., Sinopsis kak istoricheskoe proizvedenie, Trudy Otdela drevnerusskoi literatury, 15, 1958, 284–298.
Plokhy S., The Origins of the Slavic Nations: Premodern Identities in Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus, Cambridge, New York, 2006.
Pogosjan Je. A., Petr I — arkhitektor rossiiskoi istorii, St. Petersburg, 2001.
Rogov A. I., Russko-pol′skie kul′turnye sviazi v epokhu Vozrozhdeniia (Stryikovskii i ego Khronika), Moscow, 1966.
Samarin A. Yu., Rasprostranenie i chitatel' pervykh pechatnykh knig po istorii Rossii (konets XVII–XVIII v.), Moscow, 1998.
Sapozhnikov O. Ia., Sapozhnikova I. Iu., eds., Mechta o russkom edinstve. Kievskii sinopsis (1674), Moscow, 2006.
Sirenov A. V., Russkoe istoriopisanie XV–XVII vv.: v poiskakh «svoei istorii», A. V. Doronin, ed., Narrativy rusi kontsa XV – serediny XVIII v.: v poiskakh svoei istorii, Moscow, 2018, 59–79.
Steindorff L., Slavianskii mir v Sinopsise: Ot Noia do nachala grada Kieva, A. V. Doronin, ed., Narrativy rusi kontsa XV – serediny XVIII v.: v poiskakh svoei istorii, Moscow, 2018, 311–331.
Stepanov D. Iu., Rus′, Malaia Rus′, Ukraina. Etnicheskoe i religioznoe v soznanii naseleniia ukrainskikh zemel′ epokhi Ruiny, St. Petersburg, 2020.
Sysyn F., A Speech before the Tsar: Adam Kysil’s Oration on August 28, 1647 (N.S.), T. Chynczewska-Hennel et al., red., Między Wschodem i Zachodem. Rzeczpospolita XVI–XVII w. Studia ofiarowane Zbigniewowi Wójcikowi w siedemdziesiątą rocznicę urodzin, Warszawa, 1993, 133–142.
Tolochko O. P., Ukrainian translation of “Chronicles…” by Maciej Stryjkowski from the collection of O. Lazarevsky and historiographical monuments of the XVII century. Ukrainian chronograph and “Synopsis”, Zapiski Naukovogo tovaristva іm. Shevchenka, 231, Lviv, 1996, 158–181.
Tolochko O., ed., The Hustynja Chronicle, Cambridge, 2013.
Uspenskij B. A., Kratkii ocherk istorii russkogo literaturnogo iazyka (XI-XIX vv.), Moscow, 1994.
Zhilenko I. V., ed., Synopsys Kyivs′kyi, (= Lavrs′kyi al′manakh, 6), Kiev, 2002.
Zhivov V. M., Iazyk i kul′tura v Rossii XVIII v., Moscow, 1996.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Petr S. Stefanovich
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.