Email this article 
Post a Comment On the Participial Functioning of the l-form in the History of the Russian Language in the Light of Russian Dialectal Data and the Material of the Other Slavic Languages
Abstract
The article analyzes the hypothesis about the participial functioning of the l form in the history of the Russian language in the light of Russian dialectal data and the material of other Slavic languages. Many facts that confirm this hypothesis are found in both Russian dialects and Slavic languages. The first part of the paper discusses the functioning of participles in the dialect of the Opotchesky district of the Pskov region and provides the comparative analysis of the functions of the participle in the examined dialect and the l-form in the Old Russian chronicles. As the material shows, the analyzed forms have much in common, which testifies to the participial role that the l-form used to take. The second part of the paper answers some remarks made in a recent paper by M. Sheveleva by providing other facts from the history of the Russian language, Russian and other Slavic dialects, which are relevant to the correct understanding of the evolution of the l-form.
DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2022.11.1.10
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Русский)References
Avanesov R. I., Ivanov V. V., eds., Istoricheskaia grammatika russkogo iazyka. Morfologiia. Glagol, Moscow, 1982.
Bevzenko S. P., Dialektolohija, Kyiv, 1980.
Borkovskii V. I., Sravnitel′no-istoricheskii sintaksis vostochnoslavianskikh iazykov. Tipy prostogo predlozheniia, Moscow, 1986.
Bulachowskyj L. A., Russkii literaturnyi iazyk pervoi poloviny XIX veka, Moscow, 1954.
Chamiaryckі V., Suprasl′skі letapіs, Vialikae Kniastva Litoŭskae. Ėntsyklapedyia u 3 t., 2, Mіnsk, 2005, 645.
Chirkina I. P., Osobennosti otglagol′nykh prilagatel′nykh s suffiksom -l- v sovremennom russkom iazyke, Russian Language at School, 1, 1956.
Chirkina I. P., Slovoobrazovanie otglagol′nykh prilagatel′nykh s suffiksom -l- v sovremennom russkom literaturnom iazyke, Uchenye zapiski MGPI im. Potemkina, 1, Moscow, 1956.
Damborský J., Participium L-ové ve slovanštině, Warszawa, 1967.
Danylenko A., Is there any possessive perfect in North Russian? WORD, 56/3, 2005, 347–379.
Dyachenko S. V., Zhidkova E. G., Malysheva A. V., Ronko R. V., Ter-Avanesova A. V., Dialectological Expedition to Opochka District, Pskov Region, Russian Language and Linguistic Theory, 2 (36), 2018, 257–313.
Dyachenko S. V., Zhidkova E. G., Ter-Avanesova A. V., Past Participles and Perfect Constructions in Opochka Dialects, Proceedings of the V. V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute, 22: Materials of International Scientific Conference «Grammatical Processes and Systems in Synchrony and in Diachrony» (May 27–29, 2019), 2019, 213–229.
Ermolova M. V., On some verbal features in Western Russian chronicles (constructions “byti + participle in -″sh-/- v″sh -”, pluperfect), Studies of Slavic Dialectology, 23, 2021, 178–193.
Ermolova M. V., The relationship between l-forms and ″sh- / -v″sh -participles in Old Russian, Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 3, 2020, 78–100.
Giger M., Resultativa im modernen Tschechischen. Unter Berücksichtigung der Sprachgeschichte und der übrigen slavischen Sprachen, Bern, Berlin, Bruxelles, Frankfurt a. M., New York, Oxford, Wien, 2003.
Gorshkova K. V., Khaburgaev G. A., Istoricheskaia grammatika russkogo iazyka, Moscow, 1981.
Jung H., Conditioning factors in the development of the -vši perfect in West Russian, Contemporary Approaches to Dialectology. The Area of North, North-West Russian and Belarusian Dialects, I. A. Seržant, B. Wiemer, eds., Bergen, 2014, 195–215.
Knyazev Yu. P., Grammaticheskaia semantika. Russkii iazyk v tipologicheskoi perspective, Moscow, 2007.
Kopečný F., Přispěvek k problému slovanského přičesti l-ového, IV Congrès International des Slavistes. Philolofie Slave: Recueil, 2, Moscow, 138–163.
Kuz′mina I. B., Nemchenko E. V., Sintaksis prichastnykh form v russkikh govorakh, Moscow, 1971.
Kuznetsov P. S., K voprosu o skazuemostnom upotreblenii prichastii i deeprichastii v russkikh govorakh, Materialy i issledovaniia po russkoi dialektologii, 3, Moscow, Leningrad, 1949, 59–83.
Kuznetsov P. S., K voprosu o skazuemostnom upotreblenii stradatel′nykh prichastii v russkom literaturnom iazyke XVIII i nachala XIX v., Proceedings of the V. V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute, 2, Moscow, Leningrad, 1950, 105–166.
Kuznetsov P. S., Istoricheskaia grammatika russkogo iazyka. Morfologiia, Moscow, 1953.
Kuznetsov P. S., Russkaia dialektologiia, Moscow, 1954.
Lyaonchanka D. A., History of participles in Belarusian, Minsk, 1957.
Maslov Yu. S., Rezul′tativ, perfekt i glagol′nyi vid, V. P. Nedjalkov, ed., Tipologiia rezul′tativnykh konstruktsii (rezul′tativ, stativ, passiv, perfekt), Leningrad, 1983, 41–54.
Mel′nychuk O. S., ed., Vstup do porivnial′no-istorychnoho vyvchennia slov′ians′kykh mov, Kyiv, 1966.
Nedjalkov V. P., Yakhontov S. E., The Typology of Resultative Constructions, V. P. Nedjalkov, ed., Tipologiia rezul′tativnykh konstruktsii (rezul′tativ, stativ, passiv, perfekt), Leningrad, 1983, 5–41.
Nikiforov S. D., Glagol, ego kategorii i formy v russkoi pis′mennosti vtoroi poloviny XVI veka, Moscow, 1952.
Penkova Ya. A., Semantics of the Slavic future perfect and several typological parallels, Proceedings of the V. V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute, 10, Moscow, 2016, 475–488.
Penkova Ya. A., Towards the Problem of the So Called “Compound Future II” Semantics in the Old Russian Language (On the Material of the Life of St. Andrew the Fool), Russian Language and Linguistic Theory, 1 (27), 2014, 150–184.
Petrukhin P. V., Towards discourse functions of Old Russian “learned” pluperfect forms (according to Kiev and Galician-Volyn chronicles), V. Yu. Gusev, V. A. Plungian, A. Yu. Urmanchieva, eds., Studies in the Theory of Grammar, 4: Grammatical Categories in Discourse, Moscow, 2008, 213–240.
Piskorz J., Die Grammatikaliwierung eines neuen Perfekts im Polnischen, München, Berlin, Washington, 2012.
Plungian V. A., Towards the typology of the perfect in the world’s languages: introduction, Acta linguistica petropolitana, Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies, 12/2 (= T. A. Maisak, V. A. Plungian, X. P. Semionova, eds., Issledovaniia po teorii grammatiki, 7: Tipologiia perfekta), St. Petersburg, 2016, 7–36.
Plungian V. A., Urmanchieva A. Yu., Perfekt(y) v “Povesti vremennykh let”: tri perfektnye konstruktsii, Mezhdunarodnaia nauchnaia konferentsiia «Russkii glagol» (k 50-letiiu vykhoda v svet knigi A. V. Bondarko i L. L. Bulanina): Tezisy dokladov, St. Petersburg, 2017, 124–125.
Plungian V. A., Urmanchieva A. Yu., The Perfect with the auxiliary verb in the Old Russian Primary Chronicle (Povest′ Vremmennykh let) as a focus construction, Acta linguistica Petropolitana. Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies, 15/3, 2019, 223–249.
Potebnja A. A., Iz zapisok po russkoi grammatike, 1–2, Moscow, 1958.
Ryko A. I., Prichastiia na -shi v odnom zapadnorusskom govore toropetsko-kholmskogo regiona, Russian Language and Linguistic Theory, 2 (4), 2002, 171–193.
Šerech J., Participium universale im Slavischen, Winnipeg, 1953.
Seržant I. A., The So-called Possessive Perfect in North Russian and the Circum-Baltic Area. Adiachronic and Areal Account, Lingua, 122/4, 356–385.
Sheveleva M. N., On the Loss of the Old Russian Perfect and Origin of Dialectal Structures with the Word est’, Iazykovaia sistema i ee razvitie vo vremeni i prostranstve: Sbornik nauchnykh statei k 80-letiiu professora K. V. Gorshkovoi, Moscow, 2001, 199–216.
Sheveleva M. N., Once More on the Perfect and Aorist in Early East Slavic Texts, Russian Language and Linguistic Theory, 2, 2020, 151–184.
Sheveleva M. N., “Russian pluperfect” in the Old Russian texts and modern dialects, Russian Language and Linguistic Theory, 2 (14), 2007, 214–252.
Sheveleva M. N., “Sequence of tenses” in the Language of Old Russian Chronicles (on Formation of Relative Use of Tenses and Indirect Speech in Russian), Russian Language and Linguistic Theory, 2 (18), 2009, 144–174.
Shuba P. P., Dzeiasloŭ u belaruskaĭ move, Minsk, 1968.
Sidorov V. N., Iz istoricheskoi fonetiki, Moscow, 1969.
Sigalov P. S., On the history of participles-adjectives in -l, Trudy po russkoi i slavianskoi filologii, 10, Seriia lingvisticheskaia, Tartu, 1967, 3–45.
Skachedubova M. V., On the interpretation of l-forms without auxiliary used in pluperfect contexts in Hypatian Chronicle and the First Novgorodian Chronicle, Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 5, 2018, 64–76.
Skachedubova M. V., On the representation of perfect in -ši in the Manuscripts of Northwest Russia, The Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Studies in Literature and Language, 5, 2018, 31–36.
Sobinnikova V. I., Prostoe predlozhenie v russkikh narodnykh govorakh, Voronezh, 1961.
Trubinskii V. I., Ocherki russkogo dialektnogo sintaksisa, Leningrad, 1984.
Trubinskii V. I., Rezul′tativ, passiv i perfekt v nekotorykh russkikh govorakh, V. P. Nedjalkov, ed., Tipologiia rezul′tativnykh konstruktsii (rezul′tativ, stativ, passiv, perfekt), Leningrad, 1983, 216–226.
Wiemer B., Giger M., Resultativa in den nordslavischen und baltischen Sprachen (areale und grammatikalisierungstheoretische Gesichtspunkte), München, Newcastle, 2005.
Wiemer B., Slavic Resultatives and Their Extensions: Integration into the Aspect System and the Role of Telicity, Slavia, 86/2–3, 2017, 124–168.
Zakharova K. F., Orlova V. G., Dialektnoe chlenenie russkogo iazyka, Moscow, 1970.
Zhivov V. M., Istoriia iazyka russkoi pis'mennosti: in 2 v., 1, Moscow, 2017.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Maria V. Ermolova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.