Email this article 
Post a Comment Russia’s Quest for the “Historical Jesus”: Tolstoy and Dostoevsky vs. Strauss
Abstract
The works of theologian David Friedrich Strauss are significant milestones in the development of an academic project known as the “Quest for the Historical Jesus”. As part of the Quest, various researchers tried to reconstruct the life, teachings, and personality of Jesus of Nazareth using historical and philological methods, that is, operating from the standpoint of strict positivism.
The purpose of this article is to show that the works of Strauss had a significant impact on the logic and evolution of the religious quests of Leo Tolstoy and Fyodor Dostoevsky.
Tolstoy became acquainted with Strauss's ideas around the late 1870s, in a period of intensive intellectual search, which eventually led him to an acute religious crisis and rejection of the official church view on Christianity. The article shows that the writer was ultimately compelled to reject the ideas of Strauss and Renan. At the same time, some elements of Strauss's theory were so close to Tolstoy that these ideas had a definite influence on his basic religious conception.
Dostoevsky had the opportunity to become acquainted with the ideas of Strauss in the Petrashevsky Circle. This experience led to a deep life crisis on Dostoevsky's part, too. On the one hand, the writer had a negative view of ideas associated with the works of Strauss and Renan. On the other hand, all of Dostoevsky’s artistic work is directly related to his overcoming the influence of the “Strauss-Renan narrative”, which itself is evidence of the evolution of the writer’s views on faith and religion.
DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2020.9.1.9
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Русский)References
Andreev A. V., Who was Jesus of Nazareth: Reconstructions of the Historical Jesus from the Late 20th to the Beginning of the 21st Century, St. Tikhon’s University Review. Series I: Theology. Philosophy. Philology, 68, 2016, 9–25.
Arsentieva N. A., “Krik osla” i “lokus idiota”: razmyshleniya nad mezhvuzovskim sbornikom nauchnyh trudov “Roman Dostoevskogo ‘Idiot’: razdum′ia, problemy», Dostoevskii. Materialy i issledovaniia, 17, St. Petersburg, 2005, 367–390.
Bocharov S., “O bessmyslennaia vechnost′!”. Ot “Nedonoska” k “Idiotu”, T. A. Kasatkina, ed., Roman F. M. Dostoevskogo “Idiot”: sovremennoe sostoianie izucheniia, Moscow, 2001, 111–136.
Bryner E., Protestantismus, M. George, J. Herlth, C. Munch, U. Schmid, Hrsg., Tolstoj als theologischer Denker und Kirchenkritiker, Göttingen, 2014, 541–553.
Debu I. M., Konspekt knigi Shtrausa “Zhizn′ Iisusa”, Dostoevskii i mirovaia kul′tura, 22, St. Petersburg, 2007, 304–314.
Donskov A. A., Gromova L. D., Nikiforova T. G., eds., L. N. Tolstoi — N. N. Strakhov, Polnoe sobranie perepiski, 1–2, Moscow, 2003.
Dunn J., Mif, Mir Biblii. Al'manah Bibleisko-bogoslovskogo instituta sv. apostola Andreya, 8, 2001, 18–25.
Fudel S. I., Sobranie sochinenii v trekh tomah, 3, Moscow, 2005.
Golosovker J. E., Dostoevskii i Kant. Razmyshleniia chitatelia nad romanom “Brat'ia Karamazovy” i traktatom Kanta “Kritika chistogo razuma”, Moscow, 1963.
Hamilton W., A Quest for the Post-Historical Jesus, London, 1993.
Isupov K. G., Vvedenie v metafiziku Dostoevskogo (Stat′ia pervaia), Dostoevskii. Materialy i issledovaniia, 18, St. Petersburg, 2007, 27–61.
Karimsky A. M., David Fridrikh Shtraus i ego “Zhizn′ Iisusa”, Strauss D. F., Zhizn′ Iisusa, Moscow, 1992, 4–28.
Kasatkina T. A., Dostoevskii kak filosof i bogoslov: khudozhestvennyi sposob vyskazyvaniia, Moscow, 2019.
Kiiko E. I., Dostoevskii i Renan, Dostoevskii. Materialy i issledovaniia, 3, Leningrad, 1980, 106–121.
Komarovich V. L., Iunost′ Dostoevskogo, Idem, “Ves′ ustremlenie”: Stat′i i issledovaniia o F. M. Dostoevskom, Moscow, 2018, 192–235.
Kotel′nikov V. A., Hristoditseia Dostoevskogo, Dostoevskii i mirovaia kul′tura, 11, Sankt-Peterburg, 1998, 20–28.
Kristeva J., Chernoe solntse. Depressiia i melankholiia, Moscow, 2010.
Kunil′skiy A. E., “Lik zemnoi i vechnaia istina”. O vospriatii mira i izobrazhenii geroia v proizvedeniiakh F. M. Dostoevskogo, Petrozavodsk, 2006.
Lapshin I. I., Kak slozhilas′ legenda o Velikom inkvizitore, O Dostoevskom. Tvorchestvo Dostoevskogo v russkoi mysli 1881-1931 gg. Moscow, 1990, 374–383.
McLean H., In Quest of Tolstoy, Boston, 2008.
Medzhibovskaya I., Tolstoy and the Religious Culture of his time: A Biography of a Long Conversation, 1845-1887, Lanham, 2008.
Meerson O., Khristos ili “Knyaz′-Khristos”? Svidetel′stvo generala Ivolgina, T. A. Kasatkina, ed., Roman F. M. Dostoevskogo “Idiot”: sovremennoe sostoianie izucheniia, Moscow, 2001, 42–59.
Mochulsky K. V., Gogol′. Solov′ev. Dostoevskii, Moscow, 1995.
Nikitina F. G., “Slova veruiushchego” Lamenne – nastol′naya kniga petrashevtsev, T. A. Kasatkina, ed., Dostoevskii: dopolnenie k kommentariiu, Moscow, 2005, 686–691.
Nikitina F. G., Dostoevskii protiv Gegelia, Dostoevskii i mirovaia kul′tura, 20, St. Petersburg, 2004, 132–147.
Nikitina F. G., Ippolit Matveevich Debu. Konspekt knigi Shtrausa “Zhizn′ Iisusa”, Dostoevskii i mirovaya kul′tura, 22, St. Petersburg, 2007, 297–303.
Orehanov G., Lev Tolstoi. “Prorok bez chesti”. Khronika katastrofy, Moscow, 2016.
Orekhanov Y. L., “Priznanie chelovecheskoi prirody za vysshii zakon”: L. Tolstoi i F. Dostoevskii protiv odnogo intellectual′nogo trenda epokhi, Philosophy. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 4, 2019, 30–58.
Orwin D. T., Tolstoy’s Art and Thought, 1847-1880, St. Petersburg,, 2006.
Paperno I., “Kto, chto ia?”: Tolstoi v svoikh dnevnikakh, pis′makh, vospominaniiakh, traktatakh, Moscow, 2018.
Pelikan J., Jesus through the Centuries. His Place in the History of Culture, London, 1985.
Perlina N., Teksty-kartiny i ekfrazisy v romane Dostoevskogo “Idiot”, St. Petersburg, 2017.
Philipp F. H., Tolstoj und der Protestantismus, Giessen, 1959.
Reimarus H. S., Concerning the Intention of Jesus and His Teaching, Ibid, Fragments, Philadelphia, 1970, 59–269.
Slenczka R., Geschichtlichkeit und Personsein Jesu Christi. Studien zur christologischen Problematik der historischen Jesusfrage. Göttingen, 1967.
Solomina-Minihen N. N., “Ia s Chelovekom proshchus′” (K voprosu o vliianii Novogo Zaveta na roman “Idiot”), Dostoevskii. Materialy i issledovaniia, 17, St. Petersburg, 2005, 346–376.
Solomina-Minihen N. N., O roli knigi Renana “Zhizn′ Iisusa” v tvorcheskoi istorii Dostoevskogo, T. A. Kasatkina, ed., Roman F. M. Dostoevskogo “Idiot”: sovremennoe sostoianie izucheniia,Moscow, 2001, 100–110.
Stepanyan K. A., “Eto budet, no budet posle dostizheniia tseli” (“Zhizn′ Iisusa” D. F. Shtrausa i E. Zh. Renana i roman F. M. Dostoevskogo “Idiot”), Voprosy literatury, 4, Moscow, 2003, 140–158.
Stepanyan K. A., Iurodstvo i bezumie, smert′ i voskresenie, bytie i nebytie v romane “Idiot”, T. A. Kasatkina, ed., Roman F. M. Dostoevskogo “Idiot”: sovremennoe sostoianie izucheniia, Moscow, 2001, 137–162.
Tikhomirov B. N., “…Ia zanimaius′ etoi tijnoi, ibo hochu byt' chelovekom”: Stat′i i esse o Dostoevskom, St. Petersburg, 2012.
Trapeznikov V., V strane nevoli, Katorga i ssylka. Istoriko-revoliutsionnyi vestnik, 6, 1925, 196–221.
Yermilova G. G., Ideia “priobshchennoi lichnosti” v romane Dostoevskogo “Idiot”, Dostoevskii. Materialy i issledovaniia, 16, St. Petersburg, 2002, 137–149.
Young S., Kartina Gol′beina “Khristos v mogile” v strukture romana “Idiot”, T. A. Kasatkina, ed., Roman F. M. Dostoevskogo “Idiot”: sovremennoe sostoianie izucheniia, Moscow, 2001, 28–41.
Zakharov V. N., Imia avtora — Dostoevskii. Ocherk tvorchestva, Moscow, 2013.
Zeller E., Biografiia Davida Fridrikha Shtrausa, Strauss D. F., Staraia i novaia vera. Khristiane li my eshche?, Moscow, 2011, 3–11.
Zwink E., D. F. Strauß 1808 bis 1874, Stuttgart, 2008.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Protoiereus Georgy Orekhanov, Iereus Alexey Andreev
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.