Email this article 
Post a Comment A Case of Pragmaticalization in Russian: Micro-diachronic Analysis of the Particle ‘že’ in Questions
Abstract
Že is one of the most closely studied particles in Russian, but its use within interrogative sentences, although it is a separate type of use, has not been investigated in detail. In this paper, I deal with the semantic and syntactic properties of že as part of a constituent or a polar question in the 18th–19th centuries and in modern usage. Based on the Russian National Corpus data, it is demonstrated that, in modern texts, že can appear in questions in four different meanings, each of them pragmatically coloured, whereas in the 19th century and earlier, že could also have a pragmatically neutral meaning, close to a conjunctive one, which has today been lost. This diachronic development corresponds to a typologically widespread scenario and represents the process known as pragmaticalization. The proposed semantic analysis of že is further considered in the light of syntactic tendencies in the evolution of this particle. This analysis can explain the absence of že in the polar questions in modern Russian and its presence in such types of questions in the Russian language of the 18th–19th centuries. The assumption that že has lost its conjunctive-like meaning in interrogative sentences is consistent with the observation that the conjunctive že is the less frequent type of že in declarative sentences.
DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2020.9.1.12
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Русский)References
Apresyan Yu. D., Tipy poverkhnostno-semanticheskoi informatsii dlia opisaniia iazyka v ramkakh modeli «Smysl ↔ Tekst», (= Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, 1), Wien, 1980.
Athanasiadou A., Canakis C., Cornillie B., Introduction, Eidem, eds., Subjectification: Various paths to subjectivity, Berlin, 2006, 1–13.
Beijering K., Expressions of epistemic modality in Mainland Scandinavian: A study into the lexicalization-grammaticalization-pragmaticalization interface, (Rijksuniversiteit Groningen PhD dissertation in linguistics, Groningen, 2012).
Bonnot Ch., Kodzasov S. V., Semanticheskoe var′irovanie diskursivnykh slov i ego vliianie na linearizatsiiu i intonirovanie (na primere chastits «zhe» i «ved′»), K. Kiseleva, D. Paillard, eds., Diskursivnye slova russkogo iazyka: opyt kontekstno-semanticheskogo opisaniia, Moscow, 1998, 382–446.
Degand L., Evers-Vermeul J., Grammaticalization or pragmaticalization of discourse markers? More than a terminological issue, Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 16, 2015, 59–85, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.16.1.03deg
Hagstrom P., McCoy S., Presuppositions, Wh-questions, and discourse particles: Russian zě, W. Brown, J. Kim, B. Partee, R. Rothstein, eds., Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics, 11: The Amherst Meeting 2002, Michigan, 2003, 201–218.
Kasatkina R. F., Chastitsa zhe v roli tekstovogo konnektora (na materiale russkoi dialektnoi rechi), T. M. Nikolaeva, ed., Verbal′naia i neverbal′naia opory prostranstva mezhfrazovykh sviazei, Moscow, 2004, 71–82.
Paducheva E. V., Egotsentricheskie edinitsy iazyka, Moscow, 2018.
Paducheva E. V., La particule že: Semantique, syntaxe et prosodie, Les particules énonciatives en russe contemporain, 3, 1987, 11–44.
Paducheva E. V., Vyskazyvanie i ego sootnesennost′ s deistvitel′nost′iu, Moscow, 1985.
Paillard D., Že ou la sortie impossible, Les particules énonciatives en russe contemporain, 2, 1987, 173–225.
Pekelis O. E., The word èto in a wh-question: on the differences between a pronoun and a particle, Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies Papers from the Annual International Conference “Dialogue” (2019), 18 (25), 2019, 484–496.
Plungian V. A., Otsenka veroiatnosti v znachenii chastitsy zhe (k formalizatsii semanticheskogo opisaniia sluzhebnykh slov), Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics, 8, 1987, 36–40.
Rakhilina E. V., Borodina M. A., Reznikova T. I., “Taman today”: corpus research of 19th century’s Russian language, Proceedings of the V.V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute, 10, 2016, 242–255.
Sannikov V. Z., Russkie sochinitel'nye konstruktsii: semantika, pragmatika, sintaksis, Moscow, 1989.
Siemund P., Interrogative constructions, M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Österreicher, W. Raible, eds., Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook, 2, Berlin, New York, 2001, 1010–1028.
Traugott E. C., (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment, K. Davidse, L. Vandelanotte, H. Cuyckens, eds., Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, Berlin, 2010, 29–71.
Uryson E. V., Opyt opisaniia semantiki soiuzov: Lingvisticheskie dannye o deiatel′nosti soznaniia, Moscow, 2011.
Valova E. A., Slioussar N. A., Syntactic properties of the Russian enclitic ze: corpus-based and experimental approaches, Voprosy Jazykoznanija (Topics in the Study of Language), 2, 2017, 33–48.
Valova E. A., Syntactic properties of Russian enclitic particle ‘zhe, St. Tikhon's University Review. Series III: Philology, 4 (39), 2014, 16–33.
Zalizniak Anna A., Mikaelian I. L., The Russian a: toward an integral description Russian linguistics, Russian Linguistics, 3 (42), 2018, 321–344.
Zaliznyak A. A., Drevnenovgorodskii dialekt, 2-nd ed., Moscow, 2004.
Zaliznyak A. A., Drevnerusskie enklitiki, Moscow, 2008.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Olga E. Pekelis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.