Email this article 
Post a Comment Mutabilities of the Verb byt’ ‘to be’ in the Language of Olonets Lamentations
Abstract
The article examines the forms of the verb byt’ ‘to be’ in the language of Olonets lamentations, which in their meanings and functions differ from the standard uses of the all-Russian (literary and dialect) language. The forms of the present (e, est’ ‘is’, net, netu ‘is not’), past (by, bylo ‘was’) and future (budu/budet ‘will be’) and their derivatives appear in various constructions (in combination with personal verb forms, participle, infinitive, imperative) in the function of particles, as a rule, with a modal meaning. Some of such non-standard constructions are fixed in the oldest written texts of the north-western area of the Russian language, presenting a mixed Church Slavonic-Russian (hybrid) type of Russian language.
DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2023.1.06
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Русский)References
Apresyan Yu. D., Byt′, Idem, ed., Aktivnyi slovar′ russkogo iazyka, 1: A–B, Moscow, 2014, 394–401.
Apresyan Yu. D., Slovarnaia stat′ia glagola BYT′: ispravlennoe i dopolnennoe izdanie, Slavica Svetlanica. Iazyk i kartina mira, Moscow, 2013, 9–30.
Arkushyn H., Slovnyk zakhidnopolis′kykh hovirok, 2nd ed., Lutsk, 2016.
Astakhova A., Shakhmatova-Kaplan S. A., eds., Fol′klornye zapisi A. A. Shakhmatova v Prionezh′e, Petrozavodsk, 1948.
Benveniste E., Glagoly «byt′» i «imet′» i ih funkcii v iazyke, Idem, Obshchaia lingvistika, Moscow, 1974, 203–224.
Bogatyrev P. G., On the language of Slavonic folk-songs and its relation to dialect speech, Voprosy Jazykoznaniia, 3, 1962, 75–86.
Chistov K. V., Chistova B. E., eds., Prichitan′ia Severnogo kraia, sobrannye E. V. Barsovym, 1: Pohoronnye prichitan′ia, 2: Rekrutskie i soldatskie prichitan'ia. Svadebnye prichitan'ia, (= Literaturnye pamiatniki), St. Petersburg, 1997.
Dementjeva V. I., On the Reasons of a Wider Functioning of Constructions with the Verbal Form “to be” in Russian Dialects Spoken in the North-Western Area in Comparison with the Rest of Russian Dialects, Kalbotyra, 27/2, 1977, 27–37.
Dobrushina N. R., Soslagatel′noe naklonenie v russkom iazyke: opyt issledovaniia grammaticheskoi semantiki, Prague, 2016.
Eremina V. I., A. A. Shahmatov. Stranicy zhizni, Russkii fol′klor, 32: Materialy i issledovaniia, St. Petersburg, 2004, 3–47.
Eremina V. I., Duhovnye stihi v zapisi A. A. Shahmatova, Iz istorii russkoi fol′kloristiki, 7, St. Petersburg, 2007, 161–171.
Grinkova N. P., K izucheniiu oloneckih dialektov, A. A. Shahmatov. 1864–1920. Sbornik statei i materialov, S. P. Obnorsky, ed., Moscow, Leningrad, 1947, 345–390.
Isačenko A. V., Poteria glagol′nyh form v russkom iazyke (1939), Idem, Opera selecta. Russische Gegenwartsprache, russische Sprachgeschichte. Probleme der slavischen Sprachwissenschaft (= Forum slavicum, 45), München, 1976, 12–20.
Jakobson R. O., On the relation between the language of folksongs and the colloquial folk-speech, Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 3, 1962, 87–90.
Khaburgaev G. A., Sud′ba vspomogatel'nogo glagola drevnikh slavianskikh analiticheskikh form v russkom iazyke, Moscow University Bulletin, Series 9. Philology, 4, 1978, 42–53.
Klimchuk F. D., Specificheskaia leksika Drogichinskogo Poles′ia, Leksika Poles′ia. Materialy dlia polesskogo dialektnogo slovaria, Moscow, 1968, 20–70.
Knyazev Y. P., Forma i znachenie konstrukcii s chasticei bylo v russkom iazyke, Sokrovennye smysly. Slovo, tekst, kul'tura. Sbornik v chest' N. D. Arutiunovoi, Moscow, 2004, 296–304.
Kuz'mina I. B., Nemchenko E. V., K voprosu ob upotreblenii est′ v russkih govorah, The Slavic Linguistic Atlas. Materials and investigations, 2, Moscow, 1968, 144–170.
Mel′čuk I., Russian U Y-a est′ / – X constructions, Russian Language and Linguistic Theory, 1, 2019, 7–45.
Penkova Y. A., Budet′ kak istochnik formirovaniia sluzhebnyh slov (na materiale delovyh pamiatnikov XII–XV vekov), Voprosy russkogo iazykoznaniia, 13: Fonetika i grammatika: nastoiashhee, proshedshee i budushhee. K 50-letiiu nauchnoi deiatel′nosti S. K. Pozharickoi, S. V. Knyazev, A. V. Ptentsova, M. L. Remneva, eds., Moscow, 2010, 208–215.
Petrukhin P. V., Sitchinava D. V., «Russkii pliuskvamperfekt» v tipologicheskoi perspektive, Verenica liter. K 60-letiiu V. M. Zhivova, Moscow, 2006, 193–214.
Pichkhadze А. А., Expression of the Imperative and Optative Values in the Old and Middle Russian Prescriptive Documents, Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 5, 2010, 14–24.
Požarickaja S. K., Semantika nekotorykh form proshedshego vremeni glagolov v severnorusskom narechii, Revue des Ètudes Slaves, 63/4, 1991, 787–799.
Pozharitskaya S. K., Otrazhenie evoliutsii drevnerusskogo pliuskvamperfekta v govorah severnorusskogo narechiia Arhangel′skoi oblasti, The Slavic Linguistic Atlas, 21: Materials and investigations. 1991–1993, Moscow, 1996, 268–279.
Pozharitskaya S. K., Modal′nye slova, proizvodnye ot glagolov byt′, byvat′ v severnorusskoi dialektnoi rechi, Russian Language and Linguistic Theory 1, 2010, 103–131.
Sheveleva M. N., “Russian pluperfect” in the Old Russian texts and modern dialects, Russian Language and Linguistic Theory, 2, 2007, 214–252.
Sheveleva M. N., Anomal′nye tserkovnoslavianskie formy s glagolom BYTI i ikh dialektnye sootvetstviia (K voprosu o sootnoshenii tserkovnoslavianskoi normy i dialektnoi sistemy), Issledovaniia po istoricheskomu iazykoznaniiu. Pamiati professora G. A. Khaburgaeva, Moscow, 1993, 135–155.
Sheveleva M. N., Neknizhnye konstruktsii s formami glagola «byti» v pskovskikh letopisiakh, A. M. Moldovan, ed., Verenica liter. K 60-letiiu V. M. Zhivova, Moscow, 2006, 215–241.
Sheveleva M. N., O sud′be drevnerusskikh konstruktsii s nezavisimymi formami glagola byti v russkom iazyke, Moscow University Bulletin, Series 9. Philology, 6, 2008, 34–57.
Sheveleva M. N., On the Loss of the Old Russian Perfect and Origin of Dialectal Structures with the Word est′, Iazykovaia sistema i ee razvitie vo vremeni i prostranstve: Sbornik nauchnykh statei k 80-letiiu professora K. V. Gorshkovoi, Moscow, 2001,199–216.
Sheveleva M. N., Sud′ba form prezensa glagola byti po dannym drevnerusskikh pamiatnikov, Moscow University Bulletin, Series 9. Philology, 5, 2002, 55–72.
Sitchinava D. V., Pliuskvamperfekt i sviazannye s nim formy v slavianskih iazykah: tipologicheskie i areal′nye harakteristiki, Slavianskoe iazykoznanie, XVI Mezhdunarodnyi s″ezd slavistov. Doklady rossiiskoi delegacii, Moscow, 2018, 244–266.
Sitchinava D. V., Russkie marginal′nye konstruktsii s bylo: k postanovke problemy, Voprosy russkogo iazykoznaniia, 13: Fonetika i grammatika: nastoiashhee, proshedshee i budushhee. K 50-letiiu nauchnoi deiatel′nosti S. K. Pozharickoi, S. V. Knyazev, A. V. Ptentsova, M. L. Remneva, eds., Moscow, 2009, 192–199.
Sitchinava D. V., The particles bylo and byvalo in the eighteenth-century Russian, Russian Language and Linguistic Theory, 2, 2012, 257–284.
Sitchinava D. V., Tipologiia pliuskvamperfekta. Slavianskii pliuskvamperfekt, Moscow, 2013.
Toporov V. N., K voprosu ob evoliutsii slavianskogo i baltiiskogo glagola, Voprosy slavianskogo iazykoznaniia, 5, Moscow, 1961, 35–70.
Trubinskii V. I., K voprosu o tavtologii v strukture predikata (na materiale dialektnykh konstruktsii so slovom est′), Severnorusskie govory, 2, Leningrad, 1975, 148–162.
Zaliznyak A. A., Drevnenovgorodskii dialekt, Moscow, 2004
Zaliznyak A. A., Drevnerusskie enklitiki, Moscow, 2008.
Zimmerling A. V., From Integral Frameworks to Aspective Analysis, Moscow, St. Petersburg, 2021.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Svetlana M. Tolstaya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.