Imam’, iměju, imaju, imu: Constructions with Verbs with the Root im-//em- in the 15th Century East Slavic Official Documents
Abstract
The paper discusses the distribution and competition of infinitive constructions with the auxiliary verbs iměti, imati and jati, which have a reference to the future, in the 15th century East Slavic official writing. The verbs iměti and imati in combination with the infinitive could have two paradigms: imam and iměju, imaju and maju, respectively. The verb jati also had forms paronymically similar to the latter (imu, imeši, etc.). This could give rise to interaction between constructions with these auxiliaries. The data for the research was collected from the Middle Russian, Middle Belarusian and Middle Ukrainian official documents since the 15th century. It is argued that in the 15th century Middle Russian writing, there was no unification of the paradigms of iměti and jati. Two clear poles could be distinguished: construction iměti + i nfinitive with the meaning of the future with strong assertion in Church Slavonic writing, and periphrasis jati + infinitive with a phase or general factual meaning in vernacular writing. In the 15th century Old Belarusian official documents, the auxiliary verb imati/iměti had a set of paradigms imaju/iměju/maju, the paradigm imu, imeši belonging to the verb jati. There was no interaction between iměti and jati, since the maju-paradigm stronlgy prevailed, so that there were no sufficient grounds for confusion. In Old Ukrainian official documents, the use of the constructions in question varied depending on the region. In the Moldavian documents, the rapprochement between iměti and jati was most clearly evident. In the dialects of this territory, the boundary between modal constructions with imati/iměti and the phase one with jati began to blur, which contributed to the expansion of the construction imu + infinitive into the modal domain and its penetration into the contexts of the pure future tense.
DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2025.1.07
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Русский)References
Andersen H., Periphrastic futures in Slavic, Divergence and convergence, Change in verbal systems. Issues in explanation, К. Eksell, T. Vinther, eds., Bern, 2006, 9–45.
Bevzenko S. P., Istorychna morfologiia ukraїns′koї movy (Narysy iz slovozminy ta slovotvoru), Uzhhorod, 1960.
Birnbaum H., Untersuchungen zu den Zukunftsumschreibungen mit dem Infinitiv im Altkirchenslavischen. Ein Beitrag zur historischen Verbalsyntax des Slavischen, Stockholm, 1958.
Bulyka A. M., Zhuraŭski A. I., Kramko I. I., Sviazhynski U. M., Mova belaruskai pis′mennastsi 14–18 stst., Minsk, 1988.
Bybee J. L., Usage-based Theory and Grammaticalization, The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, B. Heine, H. Narrog, eds., Oxford, 2011.
Bybee, J. L., Pagliuca W., Perkins R., The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World, Chicago, 1994.
Granstrem E. E., Opisanie russkikh i slavianskikh pergamennykh rukopisei: Rukopisi russkie, bolgarskie, moldovlakhiiskie, serbskie, Leningrad, 1953.
Gudkov V. P., Parallel′ iz istorii form budushchego vremeni v serbokhorvatskom i russkom iazykakh, Kratkie soobshcheniia Instituta slavianovedeniia AN SSSR, 38: Slavianskoe iazykoznanie, Koroliuk V. D. et al., ed., Moscow, 1963.
Hansen B., Das slavische Modalauxiliar Semantik und Grammatikalisierung im Russischen, Polnischen, Serbischen/Kroatischen und Altkirchenslavischen (= Slavo-linguistica, 2), München, 2001.
Heine, B., Kuteva T., World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, Cambridge, 2004.
Kozhanov K. A., Analytic Future Tense in Russian Romani as a Calque from Eastern Slavic, Slověne, 2016, 1, 249–262.
Kozlov A. A., On the semantics of Old Church Slavonic xotěti / iměti + infinitive constructions, Russkij jazyk v nauchnom osveshchenii, 2014, 1/27, 122–149.
Křížková H., Vývoj opisného futura v jazycích slovanských, zvláště v ruštině, Praha, 1960.
Kupchynsky O., Zabuti ta nevіdomi staroukraїns′kі hramoty 14 — pershoї polovini 15 st., Zapysky Naukovoho tovarystva іm. Shevchenka u Lvovі, 233, 1997, 333–359.
Moser M., What is “próstaja mova”?, Studia Slavica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 2002, 47/3–4, 221–260.
Moldovan A. M., Piat′ novonaidennykh ukrainskikh gramot kontsa 14 — nachala 15 v., Lingvisticheskoe istochnikovedeniia i istoriia russkogo iazyka, Moscow, 2000.
Penkova Ya. A., Imu, uch′nu, stanu, budu: korpusnoe issledovanie perifraz budushchego vremeni v srednerusskoi pis'mennosti, Slavistična revija, 2019, 4/67, 569‒586.
Penkova Ya. A., Infinitivnye konstruktsii s glagolom iměti v pozdnesrednerusskoi pis′mennosti, Sub specie aeternitatis. Sbornik nauchnykh statei k 60-letiiu Vadima Borisovicha Krys′ko, Ladyzhenskii I. M., Puzina M. A., eds., Moscow, 2021, 212‒227.
Penkova Ya. A., Infinitivnye konstruktsii s glagolami iměti i khotěti v tserkovnoslavianskikh pamiatnikakh Drevnei Rusi 13 v., Kompleksnyi podkhod v izuchenii Drevnei Rusi. Sbornik materialov 12 Mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii. Prilozhenie k zhurnalu “Drevniaia Rus'. Voprosy medievistiki”, Moscow, 2023, 147–148.
Penkova Ya. A., Analysis of Distribution of Infinitive Constructions with the Verbs khotěti and iměti in the History of Russian Writing, Old Russia. The Questions of Middle Ages, 2024, 97/3, 170–185.
Penkova Ya. A., The Verbs Imati (to Have) and Brati (to Take): Distribution and Competition in the History of Russian, Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie, 2024, 23/6, 63–79.
Polekhov S. V., Krysko V. B., Prince Władysław Opolczyk’s grant document for Danilo Dažbogovič (1375), Die Welt der Slaven, 2021, 66/1, 19–45.
Sheveleva M. N., On the Grammatical Semantics of the Periphrastic Constructions Like imatь byti vs. khočetь byti in Early East Slavic Texts, Russian Language and Linguistic Theory, 2017, 2/34, 194–218.
Sheveleva M. N., On Old Russian verb iměti, possessive constructions and complex future with imamь / imu in early East Slavic texts, Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 2019, 6, 32–50.
Smirnova A. E., Compound Future Tense in “Prosta Mova” Texts, Proceedings of Petrozavodsk State University, 2021, 43/5, 66–70.
Stang Chr. S., Die westrussische Kanzleisprache des Grossfürstentums Litauen, Oslo, 1935.
Stang Chr. S., Die altrussische Urkundensprache der Stadt Polozk, Oslo, 1939.
Stoynova N. M., Imperfective Future and the Infinitive Construction of the Verb stat’ (‘become’) in Modern Russian: Competing Marker, Russian Language and Linguistic Theory, 2019, 37/1, 58–82.
Tikhomirov M. N., Prostrannye spiski Zakona Sudnogo liudem, Zakon Sudnyi liudem prostrannoi i svodnoi redaktsii, Tikhomirov M. N., ed., Moscow, 1961.
Tolstoy N. I., Istoriia i struktura slavianskikh literaturnykh iazykov, Moscow, 1988.
Yankouski F., Histarychnaia hramatyka belaruskai movy, Minsk, 1983.
Yurkovsky M., Slozhnoe budushchee vremia v ukrainskom iazyke 14–15 vv., Issledovaniia po glagolu v slavianskikh iazykakh: Istoriia slavianskogo glagola, Khaburgaev G. A., Bartoshevich A., eds., Moscow, 101–113.
Yuryeva I. S., The infinitive constructions with the verbs имамь and имоу in Old Russian texts, Russian Language and Linguistic Theory, 2011, 2/22, 68–88.
Zhovtobriukh M. A., Volokh O. T., Samiilenko S. P., Slynko I. I., Istorychna hramatyka ukraïns′koï movy, Kyiv, 1980.
Zoltan A., Vengerskoe slozhnoe budushchee v slavianskom kontekste, Vos′mye Rimskie Kirillo-Mefodievskie chteniia. Materialy konferentsii. (Rim ‒ Florentsiia, 5‒10 fevralia 2018 g.), Zapolskaya N., Obizhaeva M., eds., Moscow, 2018, 65‒70.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Yana A. Penkova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.