delicious recipe
resep masakan indonesia
resep masakan indonesia
Adi Sucipto News and Entertainment

The Name Day as a Part of Medieval Historiographical Narrative

Anna F. Litvina, Fjodor B. Uspenskij

Abstract


The article investigates the ways in which the celebration of the name day (imeniny) of Russian princes or their entourages was presented in the Russian chronicles. The custom of celebrating the name day was firmly rooted in the Russian princely environment. For a chronicle narrative, the very rootedness of this custom and the number of its associated actions plays an important role—it is this rootedness that makes stories told in the chronicles quite opaque to the modern reader. A prince’s Christian name and the day of his patron saint were considered to be important background knowledge for the audience of the medieval compiler. There were, apparently, clear ideas about appropriate behavior for prince or a person from his environment on his name day or on the eve of this day but, on the other hand, such assumptions explain why this kind of “normal” behavior rarely forms the subject of special reflection in the chronicles. It is not only a description of the celebration itself that might be very informative, whether it be a church service, a ceremonial feast with various relatives, or an exchange of gifts, but also the description of acts and deeds that were undertaken specifically on a prince’s name day. Therefore, particular attention is given here to stories about undue or inappropriate behavior on this special day. The paper deals with the function and nature of such episodes in the broader context of historiographical narrative.

Keywords


pre-Mongolian Rus’; name day; cult of saints; patron saints of Russian princes; Rurikids; historiographical narrative

References


Berezhkov N. G., Khronologiia russkogo letopisaniia, Moscow, 1963.

Dürig W., Geburtstag und Namenstag: Eine liturgiegeschichtliche Studie, München, 1954.

Kuchkin V. A., “Letopisnye povestvovaniia ob ubienii kn. Andreia Bogoliubskogo,” in: Ia. N. Shchapov, ed., Pisʹmennye pamiatniki istorii Drevnei Rusi. Letopisi. Povesti. Khozhdeniia. Poucheniia. Zhitiia. Poslaniia. Annotirovannyi katalog-spravochnik, Moscow, 2003, 61–65.

Litvina A. F., Uspenskij F. B., Vybor imeni u russkikh kniazei v X–XVI vv.: Dinasticheskaia istoriia skvozʹ prizmu antroponimiki, Moscow, 2006.

Litvina A. F., Uspenskij F. B., “Nasilʹstvennyi postrig kniazheskoi semʹi v Kieve: ot interpretatsii obstoiatelʹstv k rekonstruktsii prichin,” in: A. A. Gorsky, ed., Srednevekovaia Rusʹ: K 1150-letiiu zarozhdeniia rossiiskoi gosudarstvennosti, 10, Moscow, 2012, 135–169.

Mitterauer M., Ahnen und Heilige: Namengebung in der europäischen Geschichte, München, 1993.

Rappoport P. A., “Tserkovʹ sv. Vasiliia v Ovruche,” Sovetskaia arkheologiia, 1, 1972, 82–97.

Rappoport P. A., “O datakh zakladki i srokakh stroitelʹstva drevnerusskikh khramov,” in: Palestinskii sbornik, 32(95), 1993, 37–42.

Rappoport P. A., Drevnerusskaia arkhitektura, St. Petersburg, 1993.

Shchapov Ia. N., Drevnerusskie kniazheskie ustavy XI–XV vv., Moscow, 1976.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2015 Anna F. Litvina, Fjodor B. Uspenskij

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.