Email this article 
Post a Comment The Influence of the Island Status of a Community on Its System of Values: On the Identity of the Old Believers in Poland through Their Language
Abstract
The article considers the identity and system of values of the Old Believers in north-eastern Poland. The data for the article were open interviews eliciting self-generated labels, which are then compared with the typology of other Slavic island communities. Each of the informants was asked the questions: “How would you describe Old Believers? What are they like in your opinion?” The answers can be analyzed from various viewpoints. In the article, the scope of analysis is the structure of the lexical field of the reactions. It is then described in terms of one of the existing universal classifications of values (by J. P. van Oudenhoven and B. de Raad, a bottom-up approach). It is argued that the lexical field of the reactions reflects in a specific way the system of values, thus the analysis of the reactions to the interview questions allows for an assessment of the system of values. The most important factor is spirituality, which defines the majority of the reactions. Among other important factors are benevolence, organization, and achievement. This hierarchy is then compared to the list of the oppositions through which the identity of island communities can be defined (created by Anna Plotnikova, a top-down approach): language, religion, cultural tradition, type of incorporation into the society of the majority (dispersed vs. compact dwelling), and citizenship. From the enumerated parameters, religion seems to be the most important. Cultural tradition and type of incorporation seem to condition some of the reactions. At the same time, language and citizenship do not play any roles in the answers of the informants. Citizenship due to the fact that the group members only have Polish citizenship, so it is not an option to take part in creation of community identity. Language because linguistic shift has already started, so the community includes also Polish speakers whose knowledge of Russian is very limited and passive.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Русский)References
Antropov N., Plotnikova A., Tolstaya M., “Mezhdunarodnaia konferentsiia ‘Slavianskaia etnolingvistika: metody, rezulʹtaty, perspektivy’,” Wiener Slavistisches Jahrbuch. Neue Folge, 4, 2016, 271–277.
Bartmiński J., Bielińska-Gardziel I., Żywicka B., red., Leksykon aksjologiczny Słowian i ich sąsiadów, Lublin, 2015.
Bucholtz M., Hall K., “Language and Identity,” in: A. Duranti, ed., A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, Malden (MA), 2004, 369–394, DOI: 10.1002/9780470996522.ch16
De Raad B., Van Oudenhoven J. P., “Factors of Values in the Dutch Language and Their Relationship to Factors of Personality,” European Journal of Personality, 22, 81–108.
Duranti A., “Agency in Language,” in: A. Duranti, ed., A companion to linguistic anthropology, Malden (MA), 2004, 451–473, DOI: 10.1002/9780470996522.ch20
Costa P. T., McCrae R. R., Revised NEO Personality Inventory and NEO Five Factor Inventory Professional Manual, Odessa (FL), 1992.
Maher F. A., Tetreault M. K., “Frames of Positionality: Constructing Meaningful Dialogues about Gender and Race”, Anthropological Quarterly, 66/3 (= Constructing Meaningful Dialogue on Difference: Feminism and Postmodernism in Anthropology and the Academy, 2), 1993, 118–126, DOI: 10.2307/3317515
McCrae R. R., Allik J., eds., The Five-Factor Model of Personality Across Cultures, New York, 2002.
John O. P., Angleitner A., Ostendorf F., “The Lexical Approach to Personality: A Historical Review of Trait Taxonomic Research,” European Journal of Personality, 2, 1988, 171–203.
Ganenkova T. S., “On the Language of the Old Believers in Latgale,” in: Emigrantologia Słowian, Toruń, 2017, 25–31.
Ganenkova T. S., “On Linguistic and Ethnolinguistic Situation of Old Believers in Polish Counties of Suwalki, Sejny, and Augustow and in Latgale,” Vestnik Slavianskikh Kultur—Bulletin of Slavic Cultures, 4, 2017 (forthcoming).
Głuszkowski M., Sociologiczne i psychologiczne uwarunkowania dwujęzyczności staroobrzędowców regionu suwalsko-augustowskiego, Toruń, 2011.
Głuszkowski M., “Characteristic Features of the Language of the Old Believers’ Middle-aged Generation in Suwałki and Augustów Region,” in: D. Paśko-Koneczniak, M. Ziółkowska-Mówka, M. Głuszkowski, S. Grzybowski, eds., Staroobrzędowcy za granicą II. Historia. Religia. Język. Kultura, Toruń, 89–98.
Goldberg L. R., “The Development of Markers for the Big-Five Factor Structure,” Psychological Assessment, 4, 1992, 26–42.
Grek-Pabisowa I., Rosyjska gwara starowierców w województwach olsztyńskim i białostockim, Wrocław, Warszawa, Kraków, 1968.
Grek-Pabisowa I., Staroobrzędowcy. Szkice z historii, języka, obyczajów. Wybór prac z okazji 45-lecia pracy naukowej, Warszawa, 1999.
Knyazev G. G., Mitrofanova L. G., Bocharov A. V., “Validization of Russian Version of Goldberg’s ‘Big-Five Factor Markers’ Inventory,” Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 31/5, 2010, 100–110.
Paśko-Konieczniak D., “Historia i osadnictwo,” in: D. Paśko-Koneczniak, M. Ziółkowska-Mówka, M. Grupa, S. Grzybowski, A. Jaskólski, M. Głuszkowski, Rosyjska gwara staroobrzędowców w północno-wschodniej Polsce. Wybór tekstów, Toruń, 2016, 15.
Paśko-Konieczniak D., Grzybowski S., “Dwujęzyzność i charakterytyka gwary macierzystej,” in: D. Paśko-Koneczniak, M. Ziółkowska-Mówka, M. Grupa, S. Grzybowski, A. Jaskólski, M. Głuszkowski, Rosyjska gwara staroobrzędowców w północno-wschodniej Polsce. Wybór tekstów, Toruń, 2016, 16–17.
Pilipenko G. P., „Fieldwork on the Old Believers in Latvia,” Slavic Almanac, 3–4, 2016, 504–509.
Plotnikova A. A., Materialy dlia etnolingvisticheskogo izucheniia balkanoslavianskogo areala, Moscow, 1996.
Plotnikova A. A., Slavianskie ostrovnye arealy: arkhaika i innovatsii, ed. by S. M. Tolstaya, Moscow, 2016.
Plotnikova A. A., “Ob ekspeditsii k latgalʹskim staroveram,” Zhivaia starina, 4, 2016, 50–53.
Plotnikova A. A., “Traditions of the Old Believers in the Foreign Ethnic and Linguistic Environment,” Balkanistic Forum, 26/3, 2017, 166–180.
Plotnikova A. A., “O leksike staroobriadtsev Rumynii v istoriko-sopostavitel'noi retrospective,” Slavic World in the Third Millennium, 12, Moscow, 2017, 377–392.
Schwartz S. H., “Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries,” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1992, 1–65.
Schwartz S. H., “Cultural Value Orientations: Nature and Implications of National Differences,” Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 5/2, 2008, 36–67.
Tolstoy N. I., Gura A. V., Ternovskaya O. A., Tolstaya S. M., eds., Polesskii etnolingvisticheskii sbornik: Materialy i issledovaniia, Moscow, 1983.
Toporov V. N., Peterburgskii tekst russkoi literatury. Izbrannye trudy, St. Petersburg, 2003.
Toporov V. N., Peterburgskii tekst, Moscow, 2009.
Tsivjan T. V., Modelʹ mira i ee lingvisticheskie osnovy, Moscow, 2009.
Valentsova M. V., “Chistota,” in: N. I. Tolstoy, ed., Slavianskie drevnosti. Etnolingvisticheskii slovarʹ, 5, Moscow, 2014, 547–552.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Maxim M. Makartsev
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.