Email this article 
Post a Comment On the Problem of the Name rus’ in the Earliest Rus’ian Chronicles
Abstract
In the article the author studies the identity that was referred to by the name rus’ in the earliest chronicles of Kievan Rus’. The analysis is based on the ideas and reconstructions of Alexei A. Shakhmatov, who proved that the famous Tale of Bygone Years (1100s) had included some earlier chronicle or annalistic texts composed in the 11th century. According to Shakhmatov, the Tale originated from the so-called “Initial Composition” written in Kiev in the 1090s. The author shows that the writer or writers of the “Composition” placed Rus’ in the world history according to the eschatological schemes of Byzantine chronicles. They understood Rus’ as a Christian people and as a powerful state, and tried to “expand” its identity over local communities. The earlier texts, which can be dated back to the mid-11th century, considered Rus’ in a different way: their authors’ efforts were to specify its identity in relation to other ethnic or political groups, stressing its military victories and ignoring religious boundaries. The author of the article concludes that the intellectuals of Kievan Rus’ were able to propose a variety of distinct “strategies of identification” and “ethnic projects”.
DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2018.7.2.14
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Русский)References
Florya B. N., “Predstavleniia ob obrazovanii gosudarstva i ego osnovnykh funktsiiakh v russkom i zapadno-slavianskom letopisanii”, in: Rannefeodalˊnye slavianskie gosudarstva i narodnosti (Problemy ideologii i kulˊtury), Sofia, 1991, 43–53.
Gimon T. V., “Sobytiia XI – nachala XII v. v novgorodskikh letopisiakh i perechniakh”, in: Drevneishie gosudarstva Vostochnoi Evropy. Materialy i issledovaniia. 2010: Predposylki i puti obrazovaniia Drevnerusskogo gosudarstva, Moscow, 2012, 584–703.
Gippius A. A., “‘Povestˊ vremennykh let’: o vozmozhnom proiskhozhdenii i znachenii nazvaniia”, in: Iz istorii russkoi kulˊtury, 1: Drevniaia Rusˊ, Moscow, 2000, 448–460.
Gippius A. A., “On the linguotextological stratification of the Primary Chronicle”, in: Russian Linguistics, 25, 2, 2001, 147–181.
Gippius A. A., “Dva nachala Nachalˊnoi letopisi: k istorii kompozitsii Povesti vremennykh let”, in: Verenitsa liter. K 60-letiiu V. M. Zhivova, Moscow, 2006, 56–96.
Gippius A. A., “Predislovie k ‘Sofiiskomu vremenniku’ (kievskomu nachalˊnomu svodu): tekst, iazyk, istochniki”, in: Russian Language and Linguistic Theory, 20, 2, 2010, 143–199.
Gippius A. A., “K khazarskoi dani”, in: Vostochnaia Evropa v drevnosti i srednevekovˊe. 23: Rannie gosudarstva Evropy i Azii: problemy politogeneza, Moscow, 2011, 49–55.
Gippius A. A., “Do i posle Nachalˊnogo svoda: ranniaia letopisnaia istoriia Rusi kak obʺiekt tekstologicheskoi rekonstruktsii”, in: Rusˊ v IX–X vekakh: arkheologicheskaia panorama, Moscow, Vologda, 2012, 37–63.
Gippius A. A., “Bitvy Iaroslava Mudrogo: struktura i stratigrafia letopisnogo narrativa”, in: Narrativnye traditsii slavianskikh literatur: Ot Srednevekovˊia k Novomu vremeni. K iubileiu chlena-korrespondenta RAN E. K. Romodanovskoi, Novosibirsk, 2014, 40–48.
Gippius A., “Reconstructing the original of the Povest’ vremennyx let: a contribution to the debate”, in: Russian Linguistics, 38, 2014, 341–366.
Gippius A. A., “Giuriata Rogovich i ego rolˊ v russkoi eskhatologii (k interpretatsii statˊi 6604 g.)”, in: Akademik A. A. Shakhmatov: zhiznˊ, tvorchestvo, nauchnoe nasledie (k 150-letiiu so dnia rozhdeniia), St. Petersburg, 2015, 251–263.
Gorsky A. A., “Sviatoslav Igorevich and Otto I: Their Speeches before the Battles”, in: Old Russia. The Questions of Middle Ages, 62, 4, 2015, 35–40.
Danilevsky I. N., Povestˊ vremennykh let: germenevticheskie osnovy istochnikovedeniia letopisnykh tekstov, Moscow, 2004.
Danilevsky I. N., “Zarozhdenie gosudarstvennoi ideologii v Drevnei Rusi”, in: Iaroslav Mudryi i ego epokha, Moscow, 2008, 134–152.
Dobrovolsky D. A., “‘Teoriia kaznei Bozhˊikh’: ot Nachalˊnogo svoda k Povesti vremennykh let”, in: Lokalˊnye istoricheskie kulˊtury i traditsii istoriopisaniia, Moscow, 2011, 144–154.
Isoakho M., “The Ruler of Rusʹ against the Ishmaelites – Kiev as a Scene of Apocalyptic Wars in the Primary Chronicle”, in: Old Russia. The Questions of Middle Ages, 66, 4, 2016, 5–19.
Kuchkin V. A., “‘Russkaia zemlia’ po letopisnym dannym XI – pervoi treti XIII v.”, in: Drevneishie gosudarstva Vostochnoi Evropy. Materialy i issledovaniia. 1992–1993 gg., Moscow, 1995, 74–100.
Litvina A. F., Uspenskij F. B., Pokhvala shchedrosti, chasha iz cherepa, zolotaia luda… Kontury russko-variazhskogo kulˊturnogo vzaimodeistviia, Moscow, 2018.
Lukin P. V., “The East Slavic Tribes of the IX–XII centuries in Russian chronicles: historical memory and reality”, in: History and Memory Historical Culture of Europe before the Modern Age, Moscow, 2003, 257–285.
Lukin P. V., “Novgorodian Events of 1015. On the reliability of the records of chronicles”, in: Otechestvennaia istoriia, 4, 2007, 3–20.
Milutenko N. I., “Letopisanie Iaroslava Mudrogo (Drevneishii svod)”, in: Rossica Antiqua, St. Petersburg, 2006, 158–169.
Müller L., “Rasskaz ‘Povesti vremennykh let’ 955 g. o kreshchenii Olˊgi’”, in: Idem, Poniatˊ Rossiiu: istoriko-kulˊturnye issledovaniia, Moscow, 2000, 43–59.
Nasonov A. N., “Russkaia zemlia” i obrazovanie territorii Drevnerusskogo gosudarstva: Istoriko-geograficheskoe issledovanie, Moscow, 1951.
Petrukhin V. Ya., Rusˊ v IX–X vekakh. Ot prizvaniia variagov do vybora very, Moscow, 2013.
Rogov A. I., Florya B. N., “Formirovanie samosoznaniia drevnerusskoi narodnosti (po pamiatnikam drevnerusskoi pisˊmennosti X–XII vekov)”, in: Razvitie etnicheskogo samosoznaniia slavianskikh narodov v epokhu rannego srednevekovˊia, Moscow, 1982, 96–119.
Stefanovich P. S., “‘Skazanie o prizvanii variagov’ ili Origo gentis russorum?”, in: Drevneishie gosudarstva Vostochnoi Evropy: Materialy i issledovaniia. 2010 g.: Predposylki i puti obrazovaniia Drevnerusskogo gosudarstva, Moscow, 2012, 513–582.
Stefanovich P. S., “The Identity of Rusʹ in the Imperial and Eschatological Perspective of the Compiler of the ‘Initial Chronicle’”, in: Old Russia. The Questions of Middle Ages, 72, 2, 2018, 48–64.
Tolstoi N. I., “Etnicheskoe samopoznanie i samosoznanie Nestora Letopistsa, avtora ‘Povesti vremennykh let’”, in: Iz istorii russkoi kulˊtury, 1, Moscow, 2000, 441–447
Tsukerman K., “Une esquisse de la stratification des premières chroniques russes”, in: Collectanea Borisoglebica, 1, Paris, 2009, 183–305.
Vedyushkina I. V., “‘Rusˊ’ i “Russkaia zemlia” v Povesti vremennykh let i letopisnykh statʹiakh vtoroi treti XII – pervoi treti XIII v.”, in: Drevneishie gosudarstva Vostochnoi Evropy. Materialy i issledovaniia. 1992–1993 gg., Moscow, 1995, 101–116.
Wenskus R., Stammesbildung und Verfassung. Das Werden der frühmittelalterlichen gentes, Böhlau, Köln, Graz, 1961.
Zhivov V. M., “Ob etnicheskom i religioznom samosoznanii Nestora Letopistsa”, in: Idem, Razyskaniia v oblasti istorii i predystorii russkoi kulˊtury, Moscow, 2002, 170–186.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Petr S. Stefanovich
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.