delicious recipe
resep masakan indonesia
resep masakan indonesia
Adi Sucipto News and Entertainment

Hypocoristic Names Ending with -ec- in Old Russian

Evgeniya V. Budennaya

Abstract


The article examines Old Russian anthroponyms with the suffix -ec-, originally conveying the meaning ‘less than X’. A diachronic corpus study of 11th–17th-century texts reveals that while this suffix lacked inherent pejorative connotations in Old Russian sources, contextual (adherent) pejoration is clearly observable. For pre-15th-century chronicles, two primary usage patterns are identified—1) characters with explicit negative evaluation, and 2) individuals of lower social or communicative status. The metaphoric shift from diminutive to pejorative meaning aligns with cross-linguistic typological patterns, though in Old Russian, -ec- was not an exclusive marker of such meanings: lexical intensifiers could reinforce negative evaluation (e.g., lživyj vladyka Feodorec ‘the deceitful Bishop Feodorec’). Chronicle texts and birchbark letters further demonstrate a correlation between –ec- forms and patientive roles of referents. Quantitative analysis of epigraphic materials shows statistically significant prevalence of lower-status semantics over direct pejoration. Comparative analysis of the later (16th–17th century) official documents reveals an evolutionary trajectory: while 15th-century texts freely applied -ec- to participants of lower status (servants, debtors, children), by the 16th century it became institutionalized in legal documents—appearing in self-deprecating petitions (čelobitnye) and witness formulas in legal deeds (sales, exchanges, wills), along with other hypocoristic derivatives. By the 17th century, -ec- was gradually supplanted by other hypocoristic suffixes (-ko/-ka, -ško/-ška). Thus, the usage of -ec- in 11th–17th-century anthroponyms was governed by a complex interplay of semantic, pragmatic, syntactic, and sociolinguistic factors that evolved alongside language norms.

 

 

 

DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2026.1.02


Keywords


Old Russian; anthroponym; diminutive; semantic shift; negative evaluation; patientivity

References


Azarkh Yu. S., Slovoobrazovanie i formoobrazovanie sushchestvitel′nykh v istorii russkogo iazyka, Moscow, 1984.

Arakcheev V., «Zemtsy»: evolution of social status and property relations in 15th–16th centuries,, Rossiiskaya Istoriya, 4, 2020, 71–82.

Bæcklund A., Personal Names in Medieval Velikij Novgorod, Stockholm, 1959.

Budennaya E. V., Hypocoristic forms of Old Russian Christian names, Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 3, 2021, 26–46.

Budennaya E. V., Gurevich K. I., Kalinin A. A., Gerasimov D. V., Name Variation in Old Russian: Main Cases and Possible Interpretations, Slověne, 12/2, 2023, 19–46.

Chichagov V. K., Iz istorii russkikh imen, otchestv i familii (voprosy russkoi istoricheskoi onomastiki XV–XVII vv.), Moscow, 1959.

Dickey E., Forms of address and terms of reference, Journal of Linguistics, 33, 1997, 255–74.

Dowty D., Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection, Language, 67 (3), 1991, 547–619.

Drobysheva M. M., Kuda shel Diedil′tse kasozhich′? K prochteniiu kievskogo graffito № 149, Melnikova E. A., ed., Vostochnaia Evropa v drevnosti i srednevekov′e, Moscow, 2025, 77–82.

Duranti A., Agency in Language, Idem, A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, Malden, MA 2004, 451–473.

Fufaeva I. V., Metafora malogo. Russkie diminutivy, Moscow, 2020.

Gippius A. A., Mikheev S. M., “Assassins of the Great Prince Andrey”: An Inscription about the Murder of Andrey Bogolyubsky from Pereslavl-Zalessky, Slověne, 9/2, 2020, 63–102.

Jurafsky D. Universal Tendencies in the Semantics of the Diminutive, Language, 72(3), 1996, 533–578.

Kennedy R., Nicknames, J. R. Taylor, ed., The Oxford Handbook of the Word, Oxford, 2015, 650–668.

Khoroshkevich A. L., Polotskie gramoty kak istoricheskii istochnik, Khoroshkevich A. L., Polekhov S. V., Voronin V. A., Grusha A. I., Zhlutko A. A., Skvajrs E. R., Tyulpin A. G., eds., Polotskie gramoty XIII — nachala XVI v., Moscow, 2015.

de Klerk V., Bosch B., Nicknames as sex-role stereotypes, Sex Roles, 35, 1996, 525–541.

Litvina A. F., Uspenskij F. B., Vybor imeni u russkikh kniazei, Moscow, 2006.

Litvina A. F., Uspenskij F. B., “Se iaz rab Bozhii…” Mnogoimennost′ kak faktor i fakt drevnerusskoi kul′tury, St. Petersburg, 2020.

Nikolskaya T. N., Vorotynsk, Nikolaeva T. V., ed., Drevniaia Rus′ i slaviane, Moscow, 1978, 118–128.

Nikonov V. A., Opyt slovaria russkikh familii. II, Nikonov V. A., ed., Etimologiia, Moscow, 1971, 208–280.

Polonsky D. G., Samounichizhitel′naia modifikatsiia imen “inozemtsev” pod perom russkikh prikaznykh kontsa XVI–XVII vv., Uspenskij F. B., ed., Imenoslov. Istoriia iazyka. Istoriia kul′tury, Moscow, 2012, 81–112.

Rybakov B. A., Russkie karty Moskovii XV — nachala XVI veka, Moscow, 1974.

Strakhova S. D., Fleisher E. O., Imena sobstvennye na -iat i -il: osobennosti onomastikona na materiale novgorodskikh istochnikov, Materialy III nauchnoi konferentsii “Novgorod i Novgorodskaia zemlia. Pis′mennost′ i knizhnost′”, 2025, XXX–XXX.

Superanskaya A. V., Staltmane V. E., Podolskaya N. V., Sultanov A. Kh., Teoriia i metodika onomasticheskikh issledovanii, Moscow, 2007.

Uspenskiij B. A., Iz istorii russkikh kanonicheskikh imen (Istoriia udareniia v kanonicheskikh imenakh sobstvennykh v ikh otnoshenii k russkim literaturnym i razgovornym formam), Moscow, 1969.

Varbot Zh. Zh., Praslavianskaia morfonologiia, slovoobrazovanie i etimologiia, Moscow, 1984.

Vendina T. I., Slovoobrazovatel′nye osobennosti vostochnoslavianskikh iazykov (v sravnenii s drugimi slavianskimi iazykami), Avanesov R. I., ed., Obshcheslavianskii lingvisticheskii atlas. Materialy i issledovaniia, 16, Moscow, 1985, 41–67.

Vendina T. I., K slovoobrazovatel′nym osobennostiam iuzhnoslavianskikh iazykov (v sravnenii s drugimi slavianskimi iazykami), Ivanov V. V., ed., Obshcheslavianskii lingvisticheskii atlas. Materialy i issledovaniia, 17, Moscow, 1988, 179–205.

Volkov C. S., Stilevye sredstva delovoii pis′mennosti XVII v.: Na materiale chelobitnykh, St. Petersburg, 2006.

Voloshchuk M. M., The Galich identity in the 12th-13th cent.: landowners, dynasty and nation, Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana, 1, 2010, 165–178.

Yanin V. L., Novgorodskie posadniki, Moscow, 2003.

Yanin V. L., Zaliznyak A. A., Gippius A. A., Novgorodskie gramoty na bereste (iz raskopok 2001–2014 gg.), Moscow, 2015.

Zhivov V. M., Istoriia iazyka russkoi pis′mennosti, 1, Moscow, 2017.

Zaliznyak A. A., Novgorodskie berestianye gramoty s lingvisticheskoi tochki zreniia, Yanin V. L., Zaliznyak A. A., Novgorodskie gramoty na bereste (iz raskopok 1977–1983 gg.), Moscow, 1986, 89–219.

Zaliznyak A. A., Drevnenovgorodskii dialekt, Moscow, 2004.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2026 Evgeniya V. Budennaya

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.